Since Sept 2001, Form 4 students at our school could choose to study Commerce.
Overall speaking, the academic performance of our students was better than that of day school candidates.

2002
A
B
C
D
E
F
U
Passing %
No. sat
KTGSS students
0
6.3%
25%
40.6%
28.1%
0
0
100%
32
Day school candidates*
0.7%
2.1%
7%
21.3%
26.4%
30.8%
11.7%
57.5%
9 616

2003
A
B
C
D
E
F
U
Passing %
No. sat
KTGSS students
0
6.9%
24.1%
31%
34.5%
3.5%
0
96.5%
29
Day school candidates*
0.7%
2.8%
8.8%
23.7%
28%
28.4%
7.6%
64.0%
9 485

2004
A
B
C
D
E
F
U
Passing %
No. sat
KTGSS students
3.45%
3.45%
3.45%
44.8%
34.5%
10.3%
0
89.7%
29
Day school candidates*
0.6%
2.5%
8%
23.6%
26.3%
31.7%
7.3%
61.0%
9 831

2005
A
B
C
D
E
F
U
Passing %
No. sat
KTGSS students
0
8.6%
8.6%
45.7%
31.4%
5.7%
0
94.3%
35
Day school candidates*
0.3%
2.0%
8.1%
26.6%
32.3%
24.7%
6.3%
69.3%
10 791

2006
A
B
C
D
E
F
U
Passing %
No. sat
KTGSS students
0
3.0%
12.1%
36.4%
30.3%
18.2%
0
81.8%
33
Day school candidates*
0.7%
2.5%
7.4%
20.2%
23.3%
40.6%
6.3%
54.1%
10 802

2007
A
B
C
D
E
F
U
Passing %
No. sat
KTGSS students
2.6%
5.3%
15.8%
36.8%
21.1%
18.4%
0
81.6%
38
Day school candidates*
1.1%
2.9%
7.2%
18.2%
24.2%
39.9%
6.5%
53.6%
11 014

2008
A
B
C
D
E
F
U
Passing %
No. sat
KTGSS students
0
0
8.8%
41.2%
17.7%
32.4%
0
67.6%
34
Day school candidates*
0.7%
2.6%
9.2%
20.5%
23.6%
35.9%
7.5%
56.6%
12 486

* Sources ĄG Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority